Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41773167›Full record

ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2026

Concomitant Use of Dermo-Cosmetic Skin Care in Aesthetic Procedures: Systematic Review with Expert Panel Recommendations.

Andreas Nikolis, Mark S Nestor, Joanna Czuwara, Markus Depfenhart, Joachim W Fluhr, Flavia Alvim Sant Anna Addor, Krzysztof Piotrowski, Yuliya Zielinski, Nadége Lachmann, Inna Prygova and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Andreas NikolisDepartment of Plastic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Westmount, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Mark S NestorDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Joanna CzuwaraDepartment of Dermatology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6139-7281
Markus DepfenhartDesmond Tutu School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Joachim W FluhrCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Allergology (IFA), Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3610-0698
Flavia Alvim Sant Anna AddorMEDCIN Group-Clinical Research Unit, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1851-7342
Krzysztof PiotrowskiGlobal R&D, Galderma SA, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Yuliya ZielinskiGlobal R&D, Galderma SA, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nadége LachmannGlobal R&D, Galderma SA, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Inna PrygovaGlobal R&D, Galderma SA, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Irina BerlinGlobal R&D, Galderma SA, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0003-3716-384X
Giovanni PellacaniDepartment of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: As demand for nonsurgical aesthetic procedures increases, interest is also growing for desirable skin quality-radiant, healthy, and glowing skin-by patients seeking treatment to improve appearance. Although aesthetic medicine physicians are well positioned to advise on the role of basic skin care products in maintenance of results and healing, clear guidelines and protocols are currently lacking regarding the standard use of these products before and after aesthetic procedures. Methods: An international panel of dermatologists (n = 6) and plastic surgeons (n = 2) convened virtually in March 2022 to discuss the role of skin care before and after nonsurgical aesthetic procedures (including injectables, energy-based devices, chemical peels, and microdermabrasion). As an outcome of that meeting, expert recommendations were developed for periprocedural skin care with the goal of improving recovery time or treatment outcomes for each procedure based on clinical evidence from a systematic literature review of relevant articles published through June 2022 combined with the authors' experience. Results: Overall, 104 publications were identified and reviewed; publications could be counted more than once if they covered more than one topic (energy-based procedures, n = 70; injectable procedures including microneedling, n = 25; chemical peels, n = 21; microdermabrasion, n = 10). Common periprocedural skin care included daily routines utilizing cleansers, moisturizers, toners, hydroquinone, antioxidant serums, and sunscreens (as needed) across procedure types. Evidence supports pre/post-procedure routines (cleansers, moisturizers, toners, hydroquinone, antioxidants, sunscreens) across injectables (n = 25 studies), energy devices (n = 70), peels (n = 21), microdermabrasion (n = 10); high-evidence data limited, petrolatum/antioxidants show particular benefit post-laser. Conclusion: Panel consensus endorses tailored regimens to optimize recovery/outcomes. However, very few studies were designed to evaluate a specific routine vs no skin care treatment. Further studies are needed to provide clinical evidence supporting the effectiveness of periprocedural skin care in reducing healing time and improving aesthetic outcomes. Herein, we provide evidence- and expert-based recommendations for incorporating daily skincare, including cleansers, moisturizers, antioxidant serums, depigmenting agents, and sunscreens, into periprocedural care for minimally invasive aesthetic treatments. These regimens should be adapted to procedure type and individual post-procedural responses and symptoms to optimize outcomes and address specific patient needs.

Indexed as

aesthetic medicinechemical peelsenergy-based devicesinjectablelaser resurfacingmicrodermabrasionmicroneedlingnon-invasive interventionnon-surgical facial rejuvenationskin care

Identifiers

PMID41773167
PMCPMC12949975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.