Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41773161›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Bilateral Diffuse Uveal Melanocytic Proliferation Masquerading as Refractory Subretinal Fluid Due to Peripapillary Pachychoroid Syndrome.

Gen Nakao, Chikako Hara, Kohji Nishida

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gen NakaoOphthalmology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JPN.
Chikako HaraOphthalmology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JPN.
Kohji NishidaOphthalmology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a case of peripapillary pachychoroid syndrome (PPS) that appeared resistant to conventional treatment and was subsequently diagnosed as bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation (BDUMP) based on fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images. A 79-year-old man presented with vision loss in both eyes and was initially diagnosed with PPS based on optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography, and indocyanine green angiography findings. The patient underwent photodynamic therapy in both eyes, photocoagulation in the left eye, and 2 mg aflibercept injections in both eyes. Although he responded to the initial treatments, the response gradually diminished with subsequent injections. Due to the progression of his cataracts, the patient underwent cataract removal surgery. He was later diagnosed with BDUMP based on subsequent FAF images, which revealed characteristic ocular fundus findings known as giraffe-like patterns. Subsequent systemic evaluation revealed prostate cancer. BDUMP can masquerade as PPS or neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n-AMD), resulting in delayed diagnosis and treatment, and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of cases where PPS or n-AMD is refractory to conventional treatment, even in the absence of a known malignancy.

Indexed as

bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferationperipapillary pachychoroid syndrome: prostate cancerrefractory diseasesubretinal fluid

Identifiers

PMID41773161
PMCPMC12949715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.