ArticleCureus2026
Prevalence and Impact of Simulation Substitution on Paramedic Educational Program Success: A National Examination.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives Paramedic educational programs require sufficient rigor to prepare students to perform complex, life-saving skills. Occasionally, live clinical training opportunities are unavailable, leading to simulated skill substitution to meet training requirements. The objective of this study is to describe the prevalence of simulation substitution for clinical skills and its association with paramedic educational program success. Methods The current study is a cross-sectional evaluation of paramedic educational programs graduating students in 2019. The study utilizes the Committee on Accreditation of Educational Programs for the Emergency Medical Services Professions' annual report, which includes data on program demographics, outcomes, and questions on the use of simulation. Simulation substitution was assessed using a composite of 11 commonly taught adult/pediatric clinical skills. Descriptive statistics (n, %) and multivariable logistic regression modeling (odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI)) were used to describe the association of simulation substitution frequency and first-attempt certification exam success, defined as a program pass rate ≥75%, adjusting for program characteristics. Results A total of 640 paramedic educational programs met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 59% (379/640) had simulation substitution of skills, with the extent of substitution being variable (1-5 skills: 25% (161/640); 6-7 skills: 18% (118/640); ≥8 skills: 16% (100/640)). Paramedic program first-attempt certification examination success decreased as simulation substitution increased above five skills (OR, 95% CI: 1-5 skills: 0.71, 0.46-1.08; 6-7 skills: 0.51, 0.32-0.82; ≥8 skills: 0.53, 0.32-0.87; referent 0 skills). Conclusions Simulation substitution for isolated clinical skills is common in paramedic educational programs; however, frequent reliance on simulation may reduce the likelihood of first-attempt program success on the national certification examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.