Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41772942›Full record

SynthesisPrenatal diagnosis2026

Diagnostic Yield of Sequencing for Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetal Structural Anomalies: An Updated Systematic Review.

Karen Mei Xian Lim, Alexander Gibbs, Elizabeth Scotchman, Graeme Smith, Lyn S Chitty, Natalie J Chandler

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Prenatal diagnosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karen Mei Xian LimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8524-2177
Alexander GibbsNHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Elizabeth ScotchmanNHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7418-6037
Graeme SmithNHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Lyn S ChittyNHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4857-7138
Natalie J ChandlerNHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

Ministry of Health -SingaporeNIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical utility of sequencing in prenatal diagnosis is known, but diagnostic yield varies widely depending on clinical indication. Here we update an earlier systematic review reporting the diagnostic yield of prenatal sequencing in structurally abnormal fetuses, with particular focus on factors affecting diagnostic yield. The search strategy outlined in the previous review (2018-2022) was repeated to include reports published between October 2021 and January 2025. Combining these records with those from the earlier review, an overall incremental diagnostic yield of sequencing compared to chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was calculated and pooled in a meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed on selected, unselected, and exploratory cohorts, as well as individual phenotypic subgroups. 155 records were reviewed (89 from the current and 66 from the earlier publication). The overall pooled diagnostic yield of sequencing above CMA across all indications was 27% (95% CI 24%-30%, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed that the diagnostic yield was 40%, 20%, and 17% in selected, unselected, and exploratory subgroups, respectively. Concurrent CNV analysis of sequencing data provided nine additional diagnoses over sequential sequencing after a non-diagnostic CMA. Prenatal sequencing provides an additional yield of 27% following a non-diagnostic CMA across a range of fetal structural anomalies, and this increases to 40% with careful case-selection. Sequencing continues to be a powerful diagnostic tool when performed for well-evidenced indications.

Indexed as

Congenital AbnormalitiesFetusPrenatal DiagnosisSequence Analysis, DNAFemaleHumansMicroarray AnalysisPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41772942
PMCPMC13170049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.