Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41772899›Full record

ArticleNursing ethics2026

Why children's research assent matters: Exploring three dimensions of autonomy.

Kajsa Norberg Wieslander, Tove Godskesen, Anna T Höglund, Sara Frygner-Holm, Niklas Juth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kajsa Norberg WieslanderDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7262-3464
Tove GodskesenDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6011-6740
Anna T HöglundDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Sara Frygner-HolmDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Niklas JuthDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children's assent is an ethical and legal requirement for research that involves them. Nevertheless, studies suggest that children with cancer are not always involved in research decisions. This raises important ethical questions about how children's participation in assent should be supported and on what ethical grounds. In this paper, we explore three dimensions of autonomy in research with children: autonomy as a right, as a value, and as relational. We argue that it is important not only to respect children's autonomy but to also promote it as a value, by actively supporting children's autonomy. Central to this approach is an understanding of how relationships and trust can both enable and constrain children's autonomy. We suggest that children's autonomy may be supported in practice through capacity-sensitive participation, child-adapted and iterative information provision. This requires ongoing dialogue that is responsive to children's emotional, cognitive, and relational contexts, with particular attention to fears, decision-making challenges, and voluntariness. While concern for the well-being of children with cancer is essential, it should not be used as a justification to exclude them from the assent process. Respect for children as persons should guide recruitment to paediatric oncology research.

Indexed as

Informed ConsentInformed Consent By MinorsPersonal AutonomyChildDecision MakingHumansNeoplasmsassentchildrenclinical trialshealthcare professionalsinformed consentpaediatric oncology

Identifiers

PMID41772899
PMCPMC13415896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.