ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2026
Prenatal experience of greater neighborhood disadvantage is associated with altered fetal volumetric brain growth in utero.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neighborhood disadvantage is associated with worse health outcomes and rates of neurodevelopmental disorders. In childhood, experience of greater neighborhood disadvantage is associated with atypical structural and functional brain development, especially within the limbic system. Although these differences are observed throughout the lifespan, there is a profound gap in our understanding of how early neighborhood disadvantage impacts brain development. Using a prospective cohort of 199 healthy pregnancies from around Washington, DC, we performed serial fetal brain MRIs during pregnancy. Using nested linear mixed-effects models, we assess the impact of neighborhood disadvantage on brain volumes throughout fetal development. We found that greater neighborhood disadvantage was associated with significant differences in brain volumes, especially limbic areas. Increases in neighborhood disadvantage were linearly associated with larger volumes earlier in gestation and smaller volumes approaching term age. Importantly, these relationships vary depending on fetal sex, with different regions exhibiting sex-dependent vulnerabilities. These results suggest that even prior to birth, neighborhood disadvantage is associated with altered structural brain development. While the cause of this relationship is unclear, it may stem from the impact of maternal stress and adverse environmental exposures. Our findings provide an important lens to understand the impacts of how socioeconomic inequalities can influence development beginnings prenatally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.