Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41772824›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2026

Spatial Patterns and Overlap of Sedimentary and Rhizosphere Microbiomes of the Seagrass Zostera capensis.

Andrew Ndhlovu, Sophie von der Heyden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew NdhlovuDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0984-240X
Sophie von der HeydenDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9166-976X

Funding

African Research Universities AllianceNational Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seagrasses are important nature-based solutions for climate change mitigation and adaptation due to their carbon stocks and ecosystem service co-benefits. Characterising microbial communities in seagrass sediments and rhizospheres is essential for understanding their roles in biogeochemical cycling, seagrass health, and potential contributions to ecosystem functioning. However, the extent to which seagrass microbiomes are shared at different spatial scales is not well understood. We utilised 16S rRNA metabarcoding to characterise prokaryotic communities in the sediments of the seagrass Zostera capensis at three estuaries spanning the environmental gradient of South Africa. In addition, we characterised the rhizosphere microbiome (rhizobiome) to better understand rhizosphere and sediment community dynamics. Overall, after accounting for community in adjacent seawater, we found that Z. capensis sediment and rhizosphere microbiomes largely overlap, sharing 34 genera but also harbour core genera. The sediment microbiome and rhizobiome showed significant spatial variability, suggesting that both local-scale and broader estuary-specific factors shape site-level microbial signatures. Further, predictive functional analysis showed that the rhizobiome was enriched for nutrient cycling pathways potentially beneficial to Z. capensis. Our findings support the exploration of sediment and rhizosphere microbial communities for monitoring ecosystem health and assessing impacts from threats such as pollution and climate change.

Indexed as

BacteriaGeologic SedimentsMicrobiotaRhizosphereZosteraceaeEcosystemEstuariesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil MicrobiologySouth AfricaRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNAamplicon sequencingrhizosphereseagrass microbiomesedimentZostera capensis

Identifiers

PMID41772824
PMCPMC12953720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.