ReviewThe Australasian journal of dermatology2026
Occupational Sun Exposure and Melanoma Development: A Review of the Evidence.
Review in The Australasian journal of dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cutaneous melanomas arise through a number of causal pathways, all of which involve exposure to sunshine or artificial ultraviolet (UV) radiation to some extent. Their initiation also depends on host factors that determine susceptibility to melanoma, and whether the UV exposure is intermittent or chronic. The question of whether occupational sun exposure causes melanoma has important implications for employees, employers and litigants. This review assessed the evidence linking melanoma development to occupational exposure to sunlight. Electronic literature searches of Medline, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL to 6 May 2025 were conducted using terms for occupational solar exposure and melanoma. The reviewed observational studies of occupational sun exposure and melanoma development reported both increased and reduced risk. Many of these studies had limited sample sizes and few considered important details such as anatomical site and age, preventing exploration of features that might explain the differing results. The most robust pooled analysis suggested a 45% increase in the risk of melanoma with occupational exposure when studies included the lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) subtype (relative risk (RR) 1.45, 95% CI 1.08-1.94). When studies excluded LMM the risk of melanoma was reduced (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.86). Very few studies have considered occupational sun exposure in the context of the acknowledged causal heterogeneity for melanoma, with the role of chronic sun exposure now understood to differ by anatomical site of tumour, age at diagnosis, and other features. Large-scale cohort studies reporting risks for the various melanoma subtypes and stratifying for other important risk factors are required. Until the results of such studies are available the contribution of occupational sun exposure to melanoma development in any given patient will continue to require considered, personalised assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.