ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2026
Decisions to Access Health Care: Voices From Rural Residents in Southeast Australia.
Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDespite significant literature on access to, and utilisation of, health care, less attention has been given to the agency of rural service users to use, or not use, health services. This paper aims to understand the decisions of residents from two rural communities to use, or not use, health services.
settingParticipants were recruited from Neighbourhood Houses in two rural communities in northern Victoria, Australia, located relatively close to a regional centre.
participantsTwenty participants with significant socioeconomic needs were included.
designThe study used a qualitative design and constructivist paradigm to undertake semi-structured interviews which were analysed thematically.
resultsThree types of decisions to access health services were identified. First, regular users prioritised their health, valued health care, and usually had a trusted healthcare navigator. Second, sometimes users identified barriers to accessing services, primarily not having a trusted GP and cost. Third, avoiders of health services suggested they did not prioritise their own health, it was easier to not attend, they did not believe health services led to better health outcomes, and poverty or other social issues prevented use. Some respondents moved between the three types, being regular users for children and when they had a trusted GP, and sometimes users for themselves or when barriers arose.
conclusionThis study identified the strong role of GPs and the relational aspects of accessing and utilising health care. It calls for stronger engagement with disadvantaged rural residents to build trust in health care among those avoiding health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.