ReviewThe plant genome2026
The mirage of DNA methylation in transcriptional regulation of plants.
Review in The plant genome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA methylation around transcription start sites is not globally associated with transcription in the grain of natural and synthetic hexaploid wheat.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- The mirage of DNA methylation in transcriptional regulation of plants.The plant genome · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
"Cytosine methylation plays an important role in the regulation of gene expression in plants." Some iteration of this statement can be found in most papers centered on plant epigenetics and has become a widely accepted textbook claim. However, our generalized understanding of how DNA methylation exerts control over transcription is now challenged by observations demonstrating that transcriptional levels of most genes are unresponsive to DNA methylation changes. On a genome-wide scale, associations between DNA methylation and transcription are usually statistically weak. Even when correlations are found, the cause and effect can be difficult to identify, as methylation changes sometimes follow rather than precede transcriptional changes. While a growing number of studies explore a possible connection between differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differentially methylated genes (DMGs), we demonstrate here that DEG-DMG overlaps are often significantly smaller than what could be expected by chance. This indicates that, contrary to expectations, changes in DNA methylation and changes in transcription sometimes avoid one another. Here, we discuss such observations and their implications for the hypothesis of a widespread control of gene expression directly by DNA methylation. While there are well-documented examples where DNA methylation regulates transcription, we argue that such cases represent a minority of genes, and we opine that approaches of reverse epigenetics are therefore unlikely to find broad application in breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.