ArticleSystematic reviews2026
Effectiveness of robotic rehabilitation interventions in children with cerebral palsy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCerebral palsy (CP) is the leading cause of childhood motor disability, often requiring intensive, long-term rehabilitation to improve motor function and independence in daily activities. Robot-assisted therapy has emerged as a promising intervention, as it can deliver high-intensity, task-specific, and motivating treatment. However, evidence for its superiority over conventional rehabilitation interventions (CRIs) is inconsistent, and a comprehensive quantitative synthesis is lacking. This protocol details a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy on motor outcomes in children with CP.
methodsThis protocol has been developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. We will conduct a comprehensive search of five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library) from their inception to June 2025. The review will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing robot-assisted therapy with CRIs in children with CP. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts, and full texts and extract relevant data. Primary outcomes will include measures of gross motor function, activities of daily living (ADL), gait, and balance. Secondary outcomes will include upper limb function and quality of life. Where appropriate, we will perform a meta-analysis using a random-effects model in Stata 14.0. We will investigate sources of heterogeneity using subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Publication bias will be assessed with funnel plots and Egger's test. Furthermore, Trial Sequential Analysis will be employed to assess the robustness of the findings and control for risks of random error. The overall quality of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD420250652267.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.