ArticleTrials2026
Intraoperative breast cancer margin evaluation using fluorescence imaging with intravenous injection of indocyanine green (BREASTIFLU-1): study protocol for a randomized diagnostic accuracy trial of quantitative dose-timing assessment.
Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06227338 (ICG-fluorescence Imaging for Intraoperative Breast Cancer Margins Evaluation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ICG-fluorescence Imaging for Intraoperative Breast Cancer Margins Evaluation: a Dose-timing Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent intraoperative margin assessment techniques lack the accuracy needed for clinical practice. Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI) offers a useful technique for detection of tumoral tissue, including breast cancer (BC). There is a great inconsistency in the literature regarding the use of ICG for BC fluorescence imaging mainly concerning ICG dosing and the timing of administration. This study aims to determine the dose and timing of intravenous (IV) ICG administration that provides the optimal diagnostic accuracy for ICG-FI margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery (BCS).
methodsThis study (BREASTIFLU-1) is a phase II cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study. It is a five-arm, single-center, prospective, randomized, observational-interventional, open-label study that will include patients with histologically proven early-stage (cT1-T2, cN0-N1) BC who are planned to undergo BCS. Two preoperative timeframes will be used for the administration of five different IV ICG doses in single-dose patient arms. In the intraoperative arms, patients will receive 0.125 mg/kg or 0.25 mg/kg ICG administered IV at induction anesthesia. In the preoperative arms, patients will receive 0.5 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, or 2 mg/kg ICG administered 24 h before surgery. The primary endpoint is accuracy of the ICG-FI technique for the detection of positive surgical margins. Secondary endpoints include the following: comparison of ICG-FI technique accuracy at different doses and timings, characterization of breast tumor fluorescence, and evaluation of fluorescence intensity of axillary lymph nodes. The trial aims to include 227 patients. Participant recruitment is expected to be complete at the beginning of 2026, and results for the primary outcome are expected to be available in 2026. DISCUSSION: BREASTIFLU-1 is the first initiative to compare an intraoperative dose of ICG to preoperative ICG administration and is aligned with efforts to standardize the ICG-FI technique. Determining the best dose and timing for IV ICG injection is a crucial step toward using ICG-FI in practice. ICG-FI may provide a relatively easy and quick method to use for reducing the rate of positive margins after BCS.
trial registrationThis trial was registered on February 15, 2023 at Clinical Trials Information System EU2023-504024-26-00 and on September 10, 2023 at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06227338.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.