ArticleJournal of biological engineering2026
Investigating the impact of multinational collaborations on cultural understanding, health disparities, biomedical innovations, and professional development through project-based learning.
Article in Journal of biological engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe criticality of global health was put on full display following the COVID-19 pandemic and its devastating effects on communities, irrespective of their socioeconomic status. Biomedical innovations that have been actively developed over the years played a critical role in combating the crisis and bringing communities together. However, even with significant technological advancements, solving global health issues with realistic solutions requires an intimate understanding of culture, socioeconomics, and educational competency, among other factors. The Biomedical Innovations for Global Impact course at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, provides students with the opportunity to focus on specific healthcare system problems and work collaboratively with students from other disciplines and other countries. By collaborating with institutions in Panama and India, students are provided the opportunity to address health care system challenges under the advisement of clinical and entrepreneurial mentors. This study focused on evaluating the course via pre- and post-course surveys completed by the students, focusing on their educational experience, personal growth, professional development, and cultural understanding.
resultsStudent feedback on educational experience indicated a strong agreement that the course enhanced understanding of the design process as well as infrastructure challenges. Post-course analysis revealed an improvement in research skills, interdisciplinary communication, and real-world applications of both business and biomedical engineering principles. Approximately 85% of students agreed that the course improved their ability to engage in interdisciplinary groups while enhancing their understanding of global health. No significant shifts in the pre- and post-course responses were observed, which indicated that the high expectations of students were met. While most students recognized the value of engineering and entrepreneurial partnerships, some expressed interest in the application of these lessons on an international stage. The students’ cultural understanding prompts revealed a high agreement on its importance in global innovation. However, results revealed challenges in cross-cultural engagement and internal team communication, and active engagement.
conclusionQualitative responses revealed that students grew in empathy, cultural competence, and awareness of global health disparities. Despite the challenges that students experienced, many students appreciated the opportunity to apply their knowledge to explore diverse ideas and engage with real-world challenges as part of the course. The multicultural teams encouraged creativity and allowed students to broaden their horizons. In addition, the students had to learn to re-evaluate prior assumptions and increase their empathy, adaptability, and inclusiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.