ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2026
Patient-specific CFD modeling of CSF flow in Chiari I malformation: denticulate-ligament-induced compartmentalization explains flow patterns.
Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been widely used to study cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow in Chiari Malformation Type I (CM-I). However, most approaches rely on limited patient-specific detail, and it remains unclear whether such minimal input is sufficient to yield physiologically realistic flow predictions. In this study, we construct a series of MRI-based models of the craniocervical CSF space in a CM-I patient, complemented with representations of microanatomical features derived from ex vivo measurements and patient MRI data, to assess how CFD predictions are influenced by the choice of boundary conditions in the numerical integrations and the inclusion or omission of nerve roots and denticulate ligaments in the anatomical model. Our results reveal that while increasing patient-specific detail in boundary conditions improves agreement with velocity fields measured via phase-contrast MRI, key flow features—most notably anterior–posterior compartmentalization and bidirectional patterns during flow reversal—only emerge when denticulate ligaments are included in the model. In contrast, inclusion of nerve roots has a more localized effect on the velocity field and a modest impact on pressure drops. Our findings not only clarify how more detailed boundary conditions and improved anatomical fidelity affect velocity and pressure predictions, but also provide a mechanistic explanation for flow patterns commonly observed in CM-I that have remained unexplained, highlighting the critical role of denticulate ligaments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.