SynthesisJournal of translational medicine2026
Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants and immunomodulators in juvenile myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn the present meta-analysis, we aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants and immunomodulators for the treatment of juvenile myasthenia gravis (JMG).
methodsWe conducted a systematic search for studies published between January 1st, 2000 and July 28th, 2025, in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata (version 16.0). Cochran's Q test and the I
resultsA total of 3029 articles were retrieved. This meta-analysis included 9 cohort and case-control studies, 11 case series, 3 single-arm studies, and 1 randomized controlled trial, focusing on tacrolimus, glucocorticoids, monoclonal antibodies, and intravenous immunoglobulin. Regarding tacrolimus, 9 studies involving 310 patients assessed the efficacy of tacrolimus for treating JMG. The results showed a significant reduction in both the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) and Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores. Moreover, tacrolimus treatment allowed for a reduction in steroid dosage, with a response rate of 0.862 (95% CI: 0.716-0.967). For monoclonal antibodies, 6 studies with 67 patients analyzed the efficacy for JMG. The response rate of monoclonal antibodies was 0.993 (95% CI: 0.935-1.000). Descriptive analyses were conducted for glucocorticoids and IVIG. Besides, 5 studies with 348 patients assessed the efficacy of glucocorticoids for JMG. Included studies showed that the efficacy rate of glucocorticoid monotherapy for isolated ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) was higher than that for patients with both OMG and generalized myasthenia gravis (GMG). Finally, regarding the use of IVIG, 4 studies reported efficacy for JMG. These investigations reported a response rate ranging from 47.06% to 94.3% for IVIG therapy.
conclusionsIn summary, this was the first comprehensive meta-analysis of immunosuppressants and immunomodulators in JMG. However, most included studies were single-center retrospective observational studies. Future prospective multicenter studies are needed to further investigate the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants and immunomodulators in JMG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.