SynthesisJournal of nanobiotechnology2026
Bimodal nanobody agents for cancer imaging and potential intraoperative guidance: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A high-affinity anti-ITGB5 nanobody for hepatocellular carcinoma: Antitumor efficacy and tumor microenvironment reprogramming.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- Targeting angiogenesis: advances in the design and engineered applications of nanobodies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bimodal imaging tracers that combine nuclear and optical modalities are gaining increasing relevance for in vivo applications in oncology, particularly for surgical guidance, where both real-time visualization and preoperative deep-tissue localization are crucial. Nanobodies are heavy-chain antibody fragments that offer unique advantages in this context, such as high specificity and rapid clearance, which allows for precise tumor localization and real-time surgical navigation. In this systematic review, we evaluate research studies reporting nanobody-based tracers for dual-modality imaging and analyze their design strategies, preclinical imaging performance, and translational progress. The analyses revealed that molecular targets commonly overexpressed in cancer cells, such as HER2, EGFR, and CEA have been the primary focus in the design of these tracers, together with widely used fluorophores like Cy5 and IRDye800CW combined with radionuclides such as gallium-68, technetium-99m, and copper-64. The preclinical performance of the reported tracers was highly promising, both in absolute tumor uptake and ability to achieve high-contrast images rapidly, as highlighted by a CD38-targeting tracer that produced a ~ 96-fold tumor-to-muscle ratio within hours of injection. While achieving stable and site-specific dual labeling remains a technical challenge, the combination of high target specificity and rapid background clearance makes nanobody-based systems particularly well-suited for generating high-contrast images on the same day of administration. This positions nanobodies as a versatile platform to develop tracers that enhance real-time image-guided surgery in oncology and ultimately improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.