Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41772593›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Application of large language models in medical interview training: a study with medical students.

Jarosław Hryszko, Artur Michałek, Adam Roman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jarosław HryszkoFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland. jaroslaw.hryszko@uj.edu.pl.
Artur MichałekFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
Adam RomanFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in medical interview training. While medical interviews remain fundamental in healthcare, training methods often require human interaction, limiting practice opportunities. We investigate if LLMs can effectively simulate patients for training purposes. We examined commercially available models and fine-tuned open-source LLMs using QLoRA techniques on a dataset of medical interviews. We developed a web application employing these models and conducted in-depth interviews with medical students to evaluate its effectiveness. Students found the application helpful, rating conversation quality as good and highlighting advantages over traditional training methods, particularly regarding availability and consistency in patient symptom presentation. While students emphasized that LLMs cannot replace real patient interactions, they recognized significant benefits for supplementary training. Our findings confirm that LLMs can be valuable tools in medical interview training, providing opportunities for skill development without dependency on peer availability or scheduled sessions.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalInterviews as TopicLarge Language ModelsStudents, MedicalHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsHealthcare simulationLarge language modelsMedical educationMedical interviewsVirtual patients

Identifiers

PMID41772593
PMCPMC13067494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.