Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41772578›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

Assessing organizational social context in surgical domains: perspectives of nursing staff and first-line nurse managers and their associations with nurse-focused outcomes.

Petra Saukkonen, Mika Helminen, Sari Viinikainen, Philip Green, Eija Paavilainen, Tarja Suominen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Petra SaukkonenThe Health Sciences Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, 33014, Finland. petra.saukkonen@tuni.fi.
Mika HelminenThe Health Sciences Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, 33014, Finland.
Sari ViinikainenUnion of Health and Social Care Professionals - Tehy, Helsinki, Finland.
Philip GreenUniversity of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA.
Eija PaavilainenThe Health Sciences Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, 33014, Finland.
Tarja SuominenThe Health Sciences Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, 33014, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurse shortages underscore the need to understand how organizational culture and climate affect nurse-focused outcomes in surgical care. This study analyzed how nursing staff and first-line nurse managers perceive organizational culture and climate in surgical domains and explored the differences in their perceptions. Furthermore, it analyzed how these perceptions and discrepancies correlate with nurse-focused outcomes, such as nursing staff sickness absences and gross turnover. Additionally, the study investigated how unit sizes and care settings influence the relationship between the organizational social context and nurse-focused outcomes.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted from November 2020 to February 2021 across 52 surgical units in seven Finnish public healthcare organizations. The Organizational Social Context (OSC) measure was used to assess organizational culture and climate. Nurse-focused outcomes, sickness absences and gross turnover were obtained from HR records. Gross turnover was based on all recorded entries into and exits from the unit among employed nursing staff. Statistical methods suitable for group-level investigation were used. Statistical analyses, including Spearman correlations and regression analyses, were used to evaluate relationships between perceptions of the organizational social context and nurse-focused outcomes. Interaction effects of unit size and care settings were analyzed.

resultsParticipating nursing staff from 52 surgical groups (n = 627) and first-line nurse managers from 7 groups (n = 61) showed within-group consistency in their perceptions of organizational culture and climate based on rWG indices. Nursing staff and first-line nurse managers had significantly different perceptions of organizational culture and climate across most dimensions, with first-line nurse managers providing more positive assessments. Nursing staff’s assessments of functionality negatively correlated with nursing staff gross turnover. For first-line nurse managers, higher resistance, rigidity and stress correlated negatively and engagement positively with nursing staff gross turnover. Additionally, the analysis found statistically significant interaction effects of the care setting, showing that certain relationships between organizational social context dimensions assessed by first-line nurse managers and nursing staff gross turnover varied across different surgical care settings.

conclusionsThe findings highlight the importance of fostering a well-functioning work environment and aligning first-line nurse manager and nursing staff perceptions to improve staff retention. First-line nurse managers’ perspectives appear relevant to nursing staff gross turnover, with variation across surgical settings, highlighting the need for tailored approaches.

Indexed as

Gross turnoverManagersNurse-focused outcomesNursesOrganizational climateOrganizational cultureOSCSickness absencesSurgical care

Identifiers

PMID41772578
PMCPMC12969902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.