ArticleBMC medical education2026
Stage of manual skill acquisition with Simodont virtual reality simulator for pre-clinical dental training: an interventional matching study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) simulators in dental education. However, these studies primarily focused on the early stages of psychomotor skill acquisition and often did not account for confounding variables when assigning participants to study groups. The present study aims to determine the stage of manual skill acquisition at which VR simulator training is most effective, using a matched interventional study design.
methodsA planned crossover study with a matched design was conducted among 70 undergraduate dental students from Tel Aviv University. Matching was performed based on age, gender, dominant hand, spatial perception, and fine motor skills. To evaluate manual performance under both direct vision (Class I cavity preparation) and indirect vision (Class 1 occlusal-proximal [OP] preparation), students were evenly assigned to two groups (Group 1 and Group 2), matched to control for potential confounding factors. Using a crossover approach, each group alternated roles as the experimental or control group for the two phantom-based tasks. The experimental group trained with both the Simodont virtual reality simulator and the conventional phantom simulator, while the control group practiced solely with the conventional simulator on plastic teeth. The experimental group was further subdivided into three subgroups based on the timing of Simodont exposure corresponding to different stages of skill acquisition: cognitive, associative, and autonomous.
resultsNo statistically significant differences were observed between the experimental and control groups in manual performance scores under direct vision (p = 0.461) or indirect vision (p = 0.916). Additionally, no significant differences were found among the three experimental subgroups representing different stages of skill acquisition (p > 0.05).
conclusionThe integration of the Simodont simulator during the preclinical year does not appear to enhance dental students’ manual performance under either direct or indirect vision conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.