ArticleBMC palliative care2026
German-language adaptation of the Bereavement Risk Assessment Tool (BRAT): findings on the inter-rater reliability.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProlonged Grief Disorder (PGD) affects approximately 10% of the bereaved adults, with prevalence rates in Germany ranging between 4.7–5.4%. Early identification through pre-death risk assessment is crucial for optimal bereavement care, yet no validated German-language instrument exists. The Bereavement Risk Assessment Tool (BRAT) represents a promising solution but requires cultural adaptation and validation. The aim of this study was to adapt the BRAT for German-speaking countries and evaluate its inter-rater reliability among healthcare professionals in palliative care and hospice settings.
methodsA cross-sectional reliability study was conducted online. The BRAT was translated into German using forward and backward translation methodology, resulting in the Multiprofessioneller Fragebogen zur Trauerverarbeitung (MFT). Participants evaluated four case vignettes featuring 10 bereaved family members using the 40-item MFT. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Gwet's AC and Krippendorff's α across multiple risk categorizations.
resultsA total of 55 healthcare professionals (78.2% female, M = 51.5 years) working in German palliative care and hospice settings were recruited. Participants included diverse professional groups: nursing staff, pastoral care workers, medical doctors, psychologists, and social workers. The MFT demonstrated good to excellent inter-rater reliability across most items. The majority of items showed good to almost perfect agreement between raters. Notable variations emerged between professional groups, with inter-rater reliability being influenced by the number of response categories used for risk assessment.
conclusionsThe German adaptation represents a reliable tool for pre-death bereavement risk assessment in German-speaking healthcare settings. Profession-specific training programs may enhance consistency across occupational groups. Further validation studies examining predictive validity for PGD outcomes are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.