ArticleBMC nursing2026
Study motivation and academic performance among first-year five-year junior college nursing students: a mixed-methods study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe shortage of nursing professionals in Taiwan has become an urgent public health concern, affecting healthcare quality and workforce sustainability. Graduates of five-year junior college nursing programs represent a major source of entry-level nurses. Understanding the learning motivations and professional perceptions of newly admitted students is therefore essential for strengthening nursing education and supporting early workforce retention. This study aimed to explore first-year students’ learning motivations, perceptions of the nursing profession, and the relationships between motivation and academic performance.
methodsThis explanatory sequential mixed-methods study employed a cross-sectional quantitative survey followed by qualitative focus group interviews. A total of 93 first-year students (aged 15–16 years; predominantly female) enrolled in a five-year junior college nursing program in southern Taiwan completed the Diverse Motivations for Studying Nursing (DMSN) scale, a 46-item instrument rated on a five-point Likert scale that assesses intrinsic and extrinsic motivations for studying nursing. Academic performance data, including grades in Introduction to Nursing, First Aid, and overall semester grade point average (GPA), were obtained from academic records. Quantitative data were analyzed using independent-sample t-tests and logistic regression. In addition, focus group interviews were conducted with 24 students, and qualitative data were analyzed using clinical qualitative content analysis to further explain quantitative findings.
resultsQuantitative analysis showed that extrinsic motivation significantly predicted students’ performance in Introduction to Nursing (OR = 1.073, p = .018), whereas intrinsic motivation was not a significant predictor of academic outcomes. No significant associations were found between motivation and performance in First Aid or overall semester GPA. Qualitative analysis identified five major motivations for studying nursing: choosing courses of interest, the desire to use professional knowledge to help others, job stability, obtaining a nursing license, and viewing nursing as a calling. Students perceived nursing as a demanding profession requiring responsibility, empathy, and strong professional competence.
conclusionsExtrinsic motivation plays a key role in academic performance during the early stage of nursing education. Nursing educators should incorporate motivation-oriented strategies, career-related guidance, and professional identity development into first-year curricula to enhance student engagement and support future workforce retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.