ArticleBMC medical ethics2026
The role of trust and relationship building in the ethical recruitment of youth living with HIV in research: perspectives from Kenyan youth living with HIV, their caregivers and subject matter experts.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInclusion of youth (10–24 years) living with HIV (YLWH) in clinical research is critical to addressing their unique vulnerabilities and improving care outcomes. Examining the role of trust and relationship building in research decision-making is critical to designing ethical recruitment and engagement strategies.
methodsWe conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with YLWH (10–24 years, enrolled in HIV care at Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH) in western Kenya), caregivers (parents and guardians) of YLWH, and other subject matter experts (SMEs). Interviews focused on barriers, facilitators, and strategies to improve participant-researcher trust and relationship building, with a particular focus on recruitment and engagement strategies. Interviews were conducted with 99 participants (53% male): 40 YLWH [median age 17.5, (range 11–24), 50% female], 20 caregivers of enrolled YLWH (70% female), and 39 SMEs (33% female; 46% community leaders, 26% healthcare providers, 15% clinical researchers, 8% social scientists, 3% international research experts, 2% laboratory experts).
resultsAll groups indicated trust could be built and broken through research processes. YLWH and SMEs viewed participant identification and study recruitment through medical records as a violation of trust, indicating that their HIV status and health information should remain confidential between themselves and their clinical team. All groups preferred recruitment through existing clinician-YLWH relationships, emphasizing the importance of privacy and confidentially; this strategy was viewed as stronger and more ethical. Losses of confidentiality and mistakes in sample collection that require participants to attend additional, unnecessary research visits or provide additional samples were identified by all groups as additional barriers to relationship-building. YLWH and caregivers discussed researcher characteristics that support relationship-building, emphasizing the importance of positive demeanors and non-stigmatizing behaviors by research personnel. YLWH and SMEs discussed operational needs that foster relationship-building, including proper communication about study procedures, reliably reporting results to participants, and receiving future benefits.
conclusionsTrusting participant-researcher relationships plays an important role in YLWH research decision making and greatly influence the development of ethical recruitment strategies. Study participants highlighted more appropriate and ethical recruitment strategies, stemming from strong participant-researcher relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.