ArticleBMC medical education2026
Barriers to optimal central venous catheter training: a qualitative study of physician experiences.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCentral venous catheter (CVC) placement is a high-risk procedure requiring advanced training to minimize complications. Despite widespread use of various training approaches, little is known about how physicians experience CVC training in practice. The authors carried out this study to explore the experiences of physicians with central venous catheter (CVC) training and to identify opportunities for improvement.
methodsIn May 2024, the authors conducted an exploratory qualitative study through semi-structured interviews with six physicians at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Centre, including five attending physicians and one resident across multiple specialties that frequently perform CVC placement. Interviews lasted approximately one hour and followed a structured guide of 20 open-ended questions. Interview notes were analysed using thematic analysis by three independent researchers who identified patterns, refined themes, and ensured analytic rigor. Clinical trial number: Not applicable.
resultsThree major themes and accompanying subthemes emerged: (1) Perceived insufficient preparation due to inadequate prior training; (2) Missed training opportunities related to time constraints, variable patient volumes, and limited access to equipment; and (3) A strong desire for structured feedback, standardized protocols, and improved access to high-quality training resources.
conclusionsThis qualitative study highlights identified challenges in CVC training, including limited realism, lack of standardization, and insufficient preparation for patient-centred care. These insights provide a foundation for considering how CVC training approaches may be refined to better align with physician experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.