ArticleBMC palliative care2026
Trends and factors associated with hospice care utilization and place of death in the United States between 2002 and 2020: a retrospective data analysis based on the health and retirement study.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo examine trends in hospice service use and distribution of place of death, as well as their associated factors in the United States (US).
methodsA retrospective data analysis based on the US Health and Retirement Study between 1st January 2002 to 31st December 2020.
resultsOur analysis included 12,784 deaths, of which 3,347 (26.18%) received hospice care in the last two years of life. Hospice utilization during this period rose sharply from 6.30% in 2002 to 51.44% in 2020; however, persistent disparities in hospice use were observed among non-cancer patients and rural populations. Concurrently, hospital deaths declined from 42.23% to 26.25%, with corresponding increases in deaths at private homes (from 28.35% to 33.44%) and in hospice facilities (from 4.16% to 10.59%). Compared with hospital deaths, hospice recipients were substantially more likely to die in hospice facilities (RRR = 1748.11, 95% CI 1070.97-2853.37, P < 0.001), at home (RRR = 5.41, 95% CI 4.52–6.47, P < 0.001), or in nursing homes (RRR = 4.17, 95% CI 3.46–5.04, P < 0.001).
conclusionHospice care utilization increased markedly between 2002 and 2020, reflecting broader acceptance of palliative care and contributing to a shift from hospital deaths to deaths at home or in hospice settings. Persistent disparities in hospice use among non-cancer patients and rural populations, together with the uncertain impact of expanded hospice availability on care quality beyond place of death, warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.