ArticleBMC public health2026
Associations of air pollution and depression risk in older adults: an ML + SHAP + SEM framework.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDepression risk in older adults is a complex mental health issue influenced by multiple factors, including individual vulnerability and environmental exposure. Although many methods have been used to predict depression risk in this population, the causal relationships between these factors remain underexplored.
methodsThis study utilized data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) and an environmental pollution dataset, comprising 2,086 older adults. Ten machine learning (ML) models were trained to predict depression risk, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were applied to assess variable importance. A Structural equation modeling (SEM)-based approach was then used to examine the causal pathways and mediating mechanisms linking air pollution variables and individual variables to depression risk.
resultsAll ten ML models showed modest predictive performance, with area under the curve (AUC) values exceeding 0.6. SHAP analysis suggested pain, insomnia, and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) as the most important individual variables, while ozone (O3) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) were identified as key air pollution variables. Analysis within the SEM-based approach indicated that O3 indirectly increased depression risk through IADL and pain, while SO2 exhibited both direct and indirect negative associations with depression.
conclusionsThis study provides evidence supporting structural mechanisms linking environmental exposure and mental health. The combined ML and SEM-based approach was used to facilitate variable screening and pathway evaluation, and offers a complementary perspective for examining potential causal relationships. This integrative framework may provide a useful reference for future research on mental health and related interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.