Food pantry organizational features, nutrition environments, and partnerships: a community-engaged study in Southern California.

backgroundCharitable food organizations are critical community hubs for promoting food security and nutrition. Few studies have examined whether food pantry organizational features (e.g., setting and size) are associated with the use of health promotion strategies.

methodsThis cross-sectional study used a validated survey instrument (Nutrition Environment Food Pantry Assessment Tool+, NEFPAT+) in partnership with a southern California regional food bank to examine pantry consumer nutrition environments, including client choice models, marketing, and partnership/referral practices. Eligible pantries were: food bank partners, open at least 1/week for public distribution, and in high-poverty cities. We collected surveys from 27 of 35 eligible sites in 2024. We used descriptive statistics to summarize NEFPAT+ objective outcomes and conducted exploratory analyses to assess differences for specific objective results. Mann‒Whitney U tests and Kruskal‒Wallis tests were used to compare NEFPAT+ scores and objective results by pantry setting and size, respectively.

resultsSurveyed food pantries served a median of 450 households per month (range: 50 − 3,000). 52% were located in faith-based settings and 48% in other community settings. The median NEFPAT+ score was 39 out of 95 points (range: 8–61), indicating most pantries were classified as Silver (37%) or Gold (33%). Overall, 81% of pantries made nutritious foods easy to reach/identify, and 63% used client choice. Only 33% reported using certain marketing strategies. Few used local food sourcing or point-of-decision signage. Most pantries (78%) reported having external partnerships, and 74% referred clients to a local resource. Pantries located in other community settings used nutrition-focused strategies (i.e., client choice, healthy eating signage/recipes) and referred/partnered with community organizations (i.e., food, healthcare, employment assistance) at a significantly higher rate compared to pantries in faith-based settings. We did not find statistically significant differences by pantry size.

conclusionsThis community-engaged study reveals how food pantries may function as multifaceted community health hubs for health promotion interventions. Results show both significant organizational strengths and targeted opportunities for improvement, with strategy use varying by food pantry setting type. Future research should evaluate whether pantries in faith-based settings need additional support, engagement, or technical assistance to promote community health in marginalized communities.