ArticleBMC public health2026
Higher recreational screen time and lower step count are associated with higher cardiovascular disease risk in early adolescence.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdolescence is a critical period for developing behaviors that affect lifelong cardiovascular health. While physical activity improves cardiovascular outcomes, excessive recreational screen time is linked to negative cardiovascular indicators. This study examined associations between screen time and physical activity with cardiovascular risk factors in a large, diverse sample of early adolescents.
methodsThis study included 4,443 adolescents from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study collected at Year 2 (2018–2020) and Year 4 (2020–2022). Screen time was self-reported and categorized as low (0–4), medium (> 4–8), or high (> 8) hours/day. Physical activity was measured via Fitbit step count over 3 weeks and categorized as low (1,000–6,000), medium (> 6,000–12,000), and high (> 12,000) steps/day. Outcomes included blood pressure percentile and hypertensive-range blood pressure, which were available for the full sample, while total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, hemoglobin A1c, and testing consistent with diabetes were available in a subset (one-third) at Year 4. Adjusted linear and Poisson regression models examined joint associations of screen time and step count with cardiovascular health outcomes.
resultsAdolescents averaged 6.1 (± 5.1) hours/day of screen use and 9,280 (± 3,279) steps/day. Higher screen time and lower step count showed dose-response associations with higher diastolic blood pressure percentile (all p < 0.01). Compared to reference categories, high screen time (> 8 h/day) was associated with a 4.25-point increase in diastolic blood pressure percentile (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.85 to 6.65) and low step count (1,000–6,000 steps/day) was associated with a 7.15-point increase (95% CI 4.82 to 9.48). Both high screen time (adjusted risk ratio [ARR] 1.88, 95% CI 1.42 to 2.56) and low step count (ARR 2.35, 95% CI 1.88 to 2.94) were associated with increased risk of hypertensive-range blood pressure. Low step count was associated with -3.72 mg/dL lower HDL cholesterol (95% CI -6.52 to -2.92) and increased risk of low HDL cholesterol (ARR 2.05, 95% CI 1.79 to 2.36).
conclusionsHigher screen time and lower physical activity were associated with poorer cardiovascular health, supporting guidelines and early interventions promoting increased physical activity and reduced screen time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.