ArticleBMC public health2026
Understanding and promoting the global well-being of temporary migrant workers over time: a mixed longitudinal study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo meet the demands of Canada’s economy, the number of temporary migrant workers (TMWs) has significantly increased since 2000. However, TMWs are disproportionately represented in jobs characterized by poor working and living conditions. Such exploitation severely impacts their well-being. Addressing this critical issue requires a deeper understanding of the specific effects of employment and immigration status precariousness on the evolution of different dimensions of TMWs’ wellbeing. There is currently a significant lack of robust empirical data on well-being determinants that consider the diverse trajectories of this heterogeneous and vulnerable population. This limits the identification of specific intervention points for various subgroups of TMWs, particularly those experiencing intersectional discrimination.
methodsThis study addresses these gaps by adopting an intersectional and life-course perspective to examine well-being trajectories among TMWs in Québec. The quantitative component involves a diverse cohort of 1,000 adult TMWs employed in Québec, Canada, who will complete comprehensive questionnaires at three key measurement points over a 24-month period. These questionnaires will capture detailed measures of well-being and factors related to personal, employment/work and social resource losses or gains influencing well-being trajectories. Latent trajectories analysis will be conducted. Additionally, 40 participants who best represent the various identified latent trajectories will engage in qualitative interviews. Thematic analysis of these qualitative data will be integrated with the quantitative findings to provide an in-depth understanding of how social and structural forces shape TMWs’ well-being trajectories. An advisory committee comprising representatives from community organizations, employers, and TMWs will regularly meet to provide professional and personal insights to enhance study methods, materials, and result interpretation. DISCUSSION: This study will generate novel data to address employment, working, and living condition issues among TMWs, ultimately aiming to enhance their well-being. By integrating theoretical perspectives from many disciplines, the project will significantly contribute to the scientific literature at the intersection of well-being, employment, immigration, and precariousness. Study findings will inform the development of practical tools for employers and for professionals in migration- and well-being-related fields to mitigate risk factors affecting TMWs. A policy brief will also be prepared to communicate findings to policymakers for improving social policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.