ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
From diverse CT scans to generalization: towards robust abdominal organ segmentation.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abdominal organ segmentation is a rapidly advancing area in medical imaging, boasting numerous remarkable applications in clinical and research settings. Despite these advancements, most existing segmentation models are developed using single-source data. This homogeneity raises concerns regarding the applicability of these models to more diverse and complex clinical scenarios. This study aimed to develop a generalizable model for the semantic segmentation of abdominal organs using three widely recognized public datasets: BTCV, AMOS, and TotalSegmentator. Extensive cleaning and preprocessing were undertaken to address the challenges posed by data heterogeneity. The merging process resulted in a diverse and comprehensive dataset of 680 CT scans encapsulating varied image conditions and anatomical representations. The comparative analysis utilized two architectural frameworks: nnUNet, representing Convolutional Neural Networks, and Swin-UNETR, embodying Vision Transformers. Results demonstrate the superiority of the nnUNet model across all experiments, demonstrating superior robustness and adaptability under diverse conditions and unseen cases. However, further research could contribute to achieving a more balanced performance across patient groups. With an average Dice Similarity Coefficient of 92.3%, the developed nnUNet model establishes itself as a highly effective and competitive approach in abdominal organ segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.