Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41772476›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2026

From diverse CT scans to generalization: towards robust abdominal organ segmentation.

Nicolás Álvarez Llopis, Felipe Ocampo Osorio, Jesús Alejandro Álzate-Grisales, Alejandro Mora Rubio, Francisco García García, Reinel Tabares-Soto, María de la Iglesia Vaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicolás Álvarez LlopisUnidad Mixta de Imagen Biomédica e Inteligencia Artificial, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO-CIPF), Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana, 46001, España.
Felipe Ocampo OsorioCentro de Investigaciones Clínicas, Unidad de Inteligencia Artificial, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Valle del Cauca, 760000, Colombia. felipe.ocampo.os@fvl.org.co.
Jesús Alejandro Álzate-GrisalesUnidad Mixta de Imagen Biomédica e Inteligencia Artificial, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO-CIPF), Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana, 46001, España.
Alejandro Mora RubioUnidad Mixta de Imagen Biomédica e Inteligencia Artificial, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO-CIPF), Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana, 46001, España.
Francisco García GarcíaComputational Biomedicine Laboratory, Principe Felipe Reseach Center (CIPF), Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana, 46001, España.
Reinel Tabares-SotoDepartamento de Electrónica y Automatización, Universidad Autónoma de Manizales, Manizales, Manizales, Manizales, 170001, Colombia.
María de la Iglesia VayaUnidad Mixta de Imagen Biomédica e Inteligencia Artificial, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO-CIPF), Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana, 46001, España. delaiglesiamar@gva.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abdominal organ segmentation is a rapidly advancing area in medical imaging, boasting numerous remarkable applications in clinical and research settings. Despite these advancements, most existing segmentation models are developed using single-source data. This homogeneity raises concerns regarding the applicability of these models to more diverse and complex clinical scenarios. This study aimed to develop a generalizable model for the semantic segmentation of abdominal organs using three widely recognized public datasets: BTCV, AMOS, and TotalSegmentator. Extensive cleaning and preprocessing were undertaken to address the challenges posed by data heterogeneity. The merging process resulted in a diverse and comprehensive dataset of 680 CT scans encapsulating varied image conditions and anatomical representations. The comparative analysis utilized two architectural frameworks: nnUNet, representing Convolutional Neural Networks, and Swin-UNETR, embodying Vision Transformers. Results demonstrate the superiority of the nnUNet model across all experiments, demonstrating superior robustness and adaptability under diverse conditions and unseen cases. However, further research could contribute to achieving a more balanced performance across patient groups. With an average Dice Similarity Coefficient of 92.3%, the developed nnUNet model establishes itself as a highly effective and competitive approach in abdominal organ segmentation.

Indexed as

AbdomenImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiography, AbdominalTomography, X-Ray ComputedConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansNeural Networks, ComputerCNNComputed tomographyGeneralizabilitynnUNetOrgan segmentationSwin-UNETRViT

Identifiers

PMID41772476
PMCPMC13023199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.