ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Citrullinated histone H3 and procalcitonin in the diagnosis and predicting the outcome of septic shock.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis and septic shock stimulate a massive inflammatory response during which neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) release citrullinated histone H3 (CitH3) into the circulation, leading to tissue damage, coagulopathy, and organ failure. This study aimed to assess serum levels of CitH3 in patients with septic and non-septic shock in intensive care units and to study their correlation to septic shock severity. The study was conducted at Ain Shams University Hospitals and included 72 adult participants: 24 with septic shock, 24 with non-septic shock, and 24 healthy controls. Serum CitH3and procalcitonin (PCT) levels were measured using ELISA, and blood cultures were performed for septic shock patients. Median CitH3 levels were 5.58 ng/mL in healthy controls, 44.38 ng/mL in non-septic shock, and 198.7 ng/mL in septic shock patients (p < 0.001). CitH3 strongly correlated with SOFA scores (Non-septic: r = 0.793; Septic: r = 0.786) and ICU stay in septic patients (r = 0.477, p = 0.019). ROC analysis showed CitH3 performed better than PCT in distinguishing septic from non-septic shock patients (AUC 0.946 vs 0.747, p = 0.012) and from controls (AUC 0.991 vs 0.853, p = 0.017). Direct comparison also showed that CitH3 had superior predictive performance for mechanical ventilation (p = 0.038). CitH3 could be considered a reliable biomarker of septic shock. It can be regarded as a valuable tool for predicting prognosis and severity of sepsis. CitH3 could be a promising candidate for routine integration into sepsis management protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.