ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2026
The yield of computed tomography scan in the emergency department, tertiary care center, Saudi Arabia.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCT is widely used in emergency departments, but overuse and variable diagnostic yield remain concerns. This study assessed CT yield and factors associated with scan outcomes.
methodsA retrospective review of emergency department patients who underwent CT imaging between July and December 2023 was conducted using electronic health record data. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors independently associated with CT scan results.
resultsA total of 1380 patients were included (mean age: 50.9 years; 57% male). Positive CT findings were identified in 43.1% of scans, most commonly fractures (16.1%), hematomas (7.6%), and renal calculi (7.2%). Patients with positive CT results were more likely to be hospitalized than those with negative findings (59% vs. 31.5%). In the adjusted analysis, CT scan timing was the only factor independently associated with scan outcomes (p < 0.001). Scans performed during the daytime and early morning hours were more likely to yield positive findings than those performed in the evening.
conclusionCT imaging demonstrates a substantial diagnostic yield in the emergency department. Based on these findings, departments should consider reviewing CT ordering protocols, providing targeted education on optimal scan timing, and monitoring utilization trends to optimize diagnostic outcomes and resource allocation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.