ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2026
Elucidating biopsychosocial mechanisms in migraine: an integrative analytics approach combining genetics, neuroimaging, and machine learning.
Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Causal cross-trait mapping at single-cell resolution identifies shared immunogenetic drivers of migraine and Meniere's disease.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMigraine is a complex and disabling neurological disorder shaped by the interplay of biological, psychological, and behavioral factors. Current evidence lacks an integrated causal perspective spanning macro-level epidemiology, micro-level causal mechanisms, and clinical prediction.
methodsWe employed a multilevel analytical approach integrating genetic causal inference and neuroimaging. First, we used a two-step mediation framework to investigate causal pathways from biological markers to migraine via psychological intermediaries. Second, we examined the mediating role of brain imaging phenotypes in linking psychological factors to migraine risk. Finally, we developed a machine learning prediction model based on the identified biopsychosocial features.
resultsGenetic causal inference revealed that several biological factors influence migraine risk indirectly through psychological mediators, including neuroticism and depressive symptoms. Neuroimaging mediation analysis further identified that these psychological effects operate through structural alterations in key brain regions, including amygdala volume and the microstructural integrity of fronto-limbic white matter pathways. A random forest model incorporating the identified biopsychosocial features achieved exceptional predictive performance in classifying migraine status (Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] = 0.995), with psychological traits and body mass index among the most important predictors.
conclusionsThis study systematically elucidates the biopsychosocial mechanisms of migraine for the first time through a multi-dimensional chain of evidence, supporting a shift toward integrated biopsychosocial approaches in the clinical management of migraine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.