ArticleJournal of trauma and injury2026
Global trends influencing orthopedic surgeons' midshaft clavicle fracture management: a Bullet Health Analysis.
Article in Journal of trauma and injury, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe management of midshaft clavicle fractures varies depending on fracture characteristics, patient demographics, and surgeon preferences. However, global differences in practice patterns and surgical decision-making for this injury remain poorly characterized.
methodsAn international survey was conducted through Orthobullets between March 2021 and September 2024, targeting practicing orthopedic surgeons. Standardized polls, created collaboratively using the best available evidence and a peer-reviewed, evidence-based item list, were designed to capture global treatment preferences. Analyses were then performed to evaluate variation across subspecialties and practice environments. Multivariable regression was applied to examine associations between subspecialty, practice type, the likelihood of selecting operative management, and the preferred surgical techniques.
resultsThe study included 2,364 surgeons from 76 countries. Overall, 46% (1,076 of 2,337 respondents) selected operative treatment, with notable regional differences. Surgeons from Asia (odds ratio [OR], 1.650), Africa (OR, 1.988), and Latin America (OR, 1.785) were more likely to choose surgery, whereas those from Oceania (OR, 0.464) were less likely. Trauma specialist were 1.45 times more likely to offer operative management. Regarding immobilization, 73.4% preferred a sling, while 23.4% chose a figure-of-eight brace. Among surgeons opting for surgery, 93% (1,479 of 1,590 respondents) selected open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates a notable trend toward operative management of midshaft clavicle fractures, influenced by subspecialty and practice environment. These findings highlight the evolving landscape of fracture care and emphasize the need for standardized approaches and broader understanding across diverse healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.