Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41772371›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2026

Dynamic Updating of Cognitive Maps via Traces of Experience in the Subiculum.

Fei Wang, Andrej Bicanski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fei WangDepartment of Psychology, Max-Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-3676-0444
Andrej BicanskiDepartment of Psychology, Max-Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3356-1034

Funding

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the classical view of hippocampal function, the subiculum is assigned the role of the output layer. In spatial paradigms, some subiculum neurons manifest as so-called boundary vector cells (BVCs), firing in response to boundaries at specific allocentric directions and distances. More recently, it has been shown that some subiculum BVCs can be classified as vector trace cells (VTCs), which exhibit traces of activity after a boundary/object has been removed. Here, we propose a model of processing within subiculum that accounts for VTCs, taking into account proximodistal differences in subiculum (pSub vs. dSub) and CA1. dSub neurons receive feedforward input, either in the form of perceptual information (from BVCs in pSub) or mnemonic information (from place cells in CA1). Mismatch between these two inputs updates associative memory encoded in the synapses between CA1 and dSub. With a range of learning rates, the model captures the majority of experimental findings, including the distribution of VTCs along the proximodistal axis, the percentage of VTCs across different cue types, and the hours-long persistence of the vector trace. Incorporating experimentally reported effects of inserted objects/rewards on place cells (place field shift), we also explain why VTCs have longer tuning distances after cue removal. This adds predictive character to subiculum traces and suggests the online use of mnemonic content during navigation. Our model suggests that mismatch detection for updating spatial memory content provides a mechanistic explanation for findings in the CA1-subiculum pathway. This work constitutes the first dedicated circuit-level model of computation within the subiculum, consistent with known effects in CA1, and provides a potential framework to extend the canonical model of hippocampal function with a subiculum component.

Indexed as

CognitionHippocampusModels, NeurologicalNeuronsAction PotentialsAnimalsHumansMemorycognitive mapmismatchspatial memorysubiculumvector trace cells

Identifiers

PMID41772371
PMCPMC12953219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.