SynthesisDrug safety2026
QT Prolongation Risk of Antibody-Drug Conjugates.
Synthesis in Drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as an important therapeutic class in oncology, offering targeted delivery of potent cytotoxic agents to cancer cells, thereby reducing systemic toxicity. However, the potential for cardiac toxicity, particularly QT interval prolongation, remains a critical safety concern during ADC development and clinical use. We review the mechanisms underlying ADC-induced QT prolongation, including payload-related direct ion channel interactions and indirect effects mediated by systemic exposure. By systematically examining clinical and preclinical data across ADC classes, including auristatins, maytansinoids, topoisomerase inhibitors, and DNA alkylators, we highlight the risk evaluation of 14 US Food and Drug Administration-approved ADCs, along with their regulatory review outcomes and labeling recommendations. Most approved ADCs appear to have a low corrected QT prolongation risk at therapeutic doses; clear signals are largely confined to inotuzumab and gemtuzumab ozogamicin, whereas auristatin-, maytansinoid-, and topoisomerase-1-based ADCs have shown minimal or no corrected QT changes. Regulatory approaches to ADC QT assessment are flexible and largely driven by payload novelty: novel payloads generally require comprehensive non-clinical testing and early dedicated QT studies, whereas established payloads can often rely on prior safety data, permitting extrapolation without new QT studies and use of pooled clinical data plus concentration-QT analyses when exposure and the linker-payload structure align with historical experience. Finally, we outline a practical framework for integrating translational and regulatory considerations for evaluating QT interval prolongation risk into the development of ADCs for patients with cancer, aiming to enhance cardiac safety for patients and improve the design of preclinical and clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41772369What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.