Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41772349›Full record

ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2026

Impact of solvent choice during microfluidic manufacture on the in vivo performance of liposomal doxorubicin.

Sarah Lindsay, René Holm, Sanket Shah, Yvonne Perrie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah LindsayStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, 161 Cathedral St, Glasgow, G4 0RE, UK.
René HolmDepartment of Physics, Chemistry, and Pharmacy, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense, Denmark.
Sanket ShahTherapeutics Development and Supply, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, a Johnson & Johnson Company, Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340, Beerse, Belgium.
Yvonne PerrieStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, 161 Cathedral St, Glasgow, G4 0RE, UK. yvonne.perrie@strath.ac.uk.

Funding

VLAIO HBC.2019.2923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microfluidics offers a reproducible approach to liposome manufacture; however, the impact of solvent choice on formulation performance remains underexplored. Here, we investigated whether solvent selection during microfluidic manufacturing influences liposome performance by assessing its effect on the drug release and biodistribution of liposomal doxorubicin, using rotary evaporation as a conventional method of comparison. PEGylated liposomes (DSPC:Chol:DSPE-PEG2000, 3:1:1 w/w) were prepared using a staggered herringbone microfluidic mixer, with lipids dissolved in either ethanol or Transcutol, and compared with liposomes produced by rotary evaporation and extrusion. All formulations were actively loaded with doxorubicin via an ammonium sulphate gradient, purified by tangential flow filtration, and characterised for size, polydispersity, and drug loading. The three formulations (two microfluidic (ethanol vs Transcutol) and one rotary evaporation control) were intravenously administered to Sprague-Dawley rats (1 mg/kg), and doxorubicin concentrations in plasma and tissues were quantified using LC-MS. Although solvent choice produced liposomes with broadly comparable physicochemical properties (~ 100-120 nm, PDI < 0.25, encapsulation > 90%), Transcutol-based microfluidic liposomes showed prolonged and higher concentrations of doxorubicin within the plasma and tissue samples compared with liposomes produced by ethanol microfluidics and rotary evaporation. By contrast, the manufacturing method alone (microfluidics using ethanol as the solvent versus rotary evaporation) did not significantly influence biodistribution. These findings highlight solvent selection as an important parameter in microfluidic liposome manufacture, demonstrating that matching standard critical quality attributes and in vitro release behaviour alone may be insufficient to ensure comparable in vivo performance.

Indexed as

Antibiotics, AntineoplasticDoxorubicinSolventsAnimalsDrug LiberationEthanolEthylene GlycolsLiposomesMalePolyethylene GlycolsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTissue DistributionAntibiotics, AntineoplasticcarbitolDoxorubicinEthanolEthylene Glycolsliposomal doxorubicinLiposomesPolyethylene GlycolsSolventsBiodistributionLiposomal doxorubicinLiposomesMicrofluidic manufactureSolvent effects

Identifiers

PMID41772349
PMCPMC13619651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.