ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Non-Invasive functional assessment of severity in cerebral arterial stenosis using cerebral flow fraction: A hemodynamic study.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a major cause of ischemic stroke, but current diagnostic indices such as stenotic percentage (SP) and relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) have limitations. SP lacks functional relevance, and rCBF cannot confirm whether stenosis causes ischemia. We propose a non-invasive method to assess ischemic stroke by computing cerebral fractional flow (cFF), defined as the ratio of distal to inlet pressure across the stenosis. Using cerebrovascular generation algorithms and the Desikan-Killiany atlas, we built 66 personalized whole-brain hemodynamic models to calculate cFF and rCBF, diagnosing ischemia at rCBF ≤ 0.48. cFF showed a stronger correlation with rCBF than SP (r = 1.00 vs. 0.71, p < 0.001). ROC analysis identified a diagnostic threshold of 0.56, yielding 98.48% accuracy, validated against pressure wire and clinical trial data.This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that non-invasive cFF provides superior functional evaluation of ischemic stroke, reflecting both stenosis-induced hemodynamics and compensatory mechanisms. cFF enables accurate identification of stenosis-related ischemia, offering a valuable tool for guiding intervention in ICAS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41772297What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.