Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41772292›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Multiple imputation of multilevel data with single-level models: A fully conditional specification approach using adjusted group means.

Simon Grund, Oliver Lüdtke, Alexander Robitzsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simon GrundUniversity of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. simon.grund@uni-hamburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1290-8986
Oliver LüdtkeLeibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9744-3059
Alexander RobitzschLeibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8226-3132

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Missing data are a common challenge in multilevel designs, and multiple imputation (MI) is often used for handling them. Past research has shown that multilevel MI provides an effective treatment of missing data, so long as the imputation model takes the multilevel structure and the intended analyses into account, and modern methods have been developed that can accommodate even complex types of analyses. However, multilevel MI can be difficult to apply in practice, where the multilevel structure is often not very pronounced or not of immediate interest in the analysis. In these applications, existing methods can become unstable and often struggle to provide reliable results. In this article, we introduce a fully conditional specification (FCS) approach to multilevel MI that combines single-level imputation methods with group means (GM) or adjusted group means (AGM) to accommodate the multilevel structure. Based on theoretical investigations and multiple simulation studies, we evaluated the performance of these methods across balanced and unbalanced designs and with larger numbers of variables. Our findings suggest that the AGM approach - though not the GM approach - performs well across most scenarios we investigated and can even outperform conventional multilevel MI approaches in challenging applications. We also provide an illustrative example of implementing these methods in a simulated setting and discuss the implications of our findings for practice.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalMultilevel AnalysisComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansGroup meansMany variablesMissing dataMixed-effectsMultilevelMultiple imputation

Identifiers

PMID41772292
PMCPMC12953426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.