ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
Challenges in identifying paediatric cancer predisposition syndromes: international SCOPE survey and SIOPE expert consensus recommendations.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Population-based genomic detection of childhood cancer predisposition using newborn dried blood spots.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer Predisposition Syndromes (CPS) are heritable genetic conditions associated with an increased risk of developing various cancers throughout life. While early identification and tumour surveillance can improve outcomes, CPS are often underdiagnosed in clinical practice. To evaluate clinicians' perspectives and identify barriers to CPS identification and care across Europe, we conducted the SCOPE study: a three-part cross-sectional survey of paediatric haematology/oncology professionals, followed by a modified Delphi consensus process with members of the SIOP Europe Host Genome Working Group. A total of 185 paediatric oncologists from 22 countries participated in the survey. More than 40% of participants reported low or uncertain confidence across different CPS-related tasks, particularly in counselling families (64.3%) and interpreting germline genetic findings (57.3%). Access to clinical geneticists and dedicated CPS clinics were predictors of higher confidence for some domains, while individual experience and institutional patient volume had limited influence. Regular use of universal CPS screening tools was low (42.3%), with most clinicians relying on personal judgement rather than structured criteria. The most cited barriers were lack of screening guidelines (57%) and difficulties in interpreting results (35.1%). Regular training and workshops, availability of genetic counsellors or educators for patient support, and patient-friendly education material were most cited as areas of improvement. The Delphi process led to three recommendations: (1) improve clinician training and communication strategies, (2) integrate CPS screening into standard treatment plans, and (3) develop accessible, patient-centred educational materials. These recommendations highlight opportunities to enhance CPS care through structured support, interdisciplinary collaboration, and systematic screening approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.