Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41772280›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2026

Redefining the central pattern generator for vertebrate locomotion.

Abdeljabbar El Manira

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. In conversation with Grégoire Courtine.Nature neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Abdeljabbar El ManiraDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. abdel.elmanira@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5920-9384

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its original formulation, the concept of the central pattern generator (CPG) has provided a foundational framework for understanding vertebrate locomotion. Recent advances in circuit-level neuroscience in zebrafish have redefined the CPG as a dynamic, modular and hybrid sensorimotor system. A central shift has been the replacement of the classical view of the CPG as a unitary rhythm generator with the idea that it is made up of speed-specific modules that are recruited via gear-shifting mechanisms tailored to behavioural demands. Brainstem circuits have emerged as layered controllers that initiate locomotion and modulate episode duration, speed and direction, whereas motor neurons and proprioceptors are now recognized as integral CPG components that shape rhythm and coordination. Here, I use zebrafish as a primary reference point - alongside explicit comparisons to conserved and divergent principles in mammals - to highlight new facets of the vertebrate CPG that redefine it as a highly adaptable, multilayered control system that is continuously tuned by sensory feedback and descending input. This offers a roadmap for decoding the neural logic of adaptive movement across contexts and evolutionary scales and highlights how principles revealed in zebrafish can provide testable hypotheses for terrestrial vertebrates.

Indexed as

Central Pattern GeneratorsLocomotionAnimalsHumansMotor NeuronsVertebratesZebrafish

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.