Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41772278›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2026

Sexual Health in Islam: Constructing a Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) Scale for the Jordanian Context.

Basim Aldahadha

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Basim AldahadhaAjman University, College of Humanities and Sciences, Department of Psychology, Ajman, UAE. b.aldahadha@ajman.ac.ae.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6630-4718

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies have reported knowledge gaps and limitations in access to sexual health information among Jordanian youth and adults. This study aimed to develop a knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) scale based on an integrative framework that combines health and religion. The scale was developed through stages of content validity and construct validity. The scale was presented to a group of parents, mosque imams, and educational sciences experts (N = 53) to judge the items' relevance and representativeness. The second stage involved exploratory factor analysis (EFA) (N = 758) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (N = 311). Difficulty and discrimination coefficient tests were performed (N = 1069). Following content validity procedures and EFA, the scale was shortened from 90 to 67 items, distributed across three factors: knowledge (25 items), attitudes (21 items), and practice (21 items). The total variance explained in the attitudes and practice factors was 59.64%. The results of CFA showed that the attitudes and practice factors demonstrated unidimensionality and good construct validity. The test-retest reliability coefficients for the three factors were 0.901, 0.782, and 0.853, respectively. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the three factors were high (0.892, 0.802, and 0.745, respectively). Finally, the results showed that the internal consistency values (Cronbach's α) for the items ranged from 0.718 to 0.883. We conclude that the KAP Sexual Health Scale (Islamic Context-Jordan) is a reliable scientific tool. It has the potential to have a significant scientific and practical impact on improving sexual health.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeIslamSexual HealthAdolescentAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansJordanMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAttitudesIslamJordanKnowledgePracticesSexual health

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.