Observational studyIrish journal of medical science2026
A Descriptive Analysis of GP Referrals to a Model 4 Emergency Department in the West of Ireland.
Observational study in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGeneral Practitioner (GP) referrals to Emergency Departments (EDs) are common in Ireland, yet the structure and content of referral letters in Ireland are poorly described. Understanding these patterns may highlight opportunities to optimise communication and streamline patient flow.
aimThe aim of the study was to describe the characteristics, timing, reasons, and content of GP referral letters to a model 4 emergency department, and to identify areas for improvement for GP to ED communication.
methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted at University Hospital Galway, a Model 4 ED, analysing all electronic GP referral letters submitted via Healthlink during a two-week period in October 2024. Letters were anonymised, and data on demographics, referral content, and specific requests were extracted. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis were performed using SPSS v29.
resultsOf 654 GP referrals reviewed, 644 were eligible for analysis. Most referrals originated within 5 km of the hospital (42%) and presented during working hours (84%). A likely diagnosis was present in 36%, a specific request in 43%, and vital signs in 60% of letters. Imaging (34%) and specialty review (31%) were the most frequent requests. The most common referral themes were injuries (13%), abdominal pain (12%), and infections (8%).
conclusionMany GP referrals to this model 4 ED requested imaging or request for a review by a specialty. Documentation within letters was varied. Engaging GPs and highlighting key clinical details could improve documentation and, in turn, improve communication and patient disposition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.