ReviewBehavior research methods2026
Joint attention in autism: A narrative review of assessment techniques from behavioral observation to artificial intelligence.
Review in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Joint attention (JA), the shared focus between two individuals on an object or event, plays a pivotal role in social communication, cognitive development, and language acquisition during early childhood. However, JA is frequently impaired in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), highlighting the need for precise assessment to support early diagnosis and intervention. This narrative review explores the evolution of JA assessment methods, tracing the shift from human-mediated techniques to technology-driven approaches, including artificial intelligence (AI). The study analyzes research indexed in major bibliographic databases between 2002 and 2024, categorizing findings into human-mediated and technology-assisted methods. Key aspects such as target populations, data collection processes, and validation strategies are examined. By highlighting the strengths and limitations of existing approaches, the review identifies future research directions that can advance JA assessment and inform early intervention strategies, ultimately benefiting children with ASD and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.