ArticleScientific reports2026
Multimodal AI-based 28-day mortality prediction of pneumonia patients at ED discharge: a multicenter study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study develops and evaluates an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven model to predict the 28-day mortality in patients with pneumonia by integrating AI-interpreted chest radiographs (CXR) and clinical data available at the time of emergency department (ED) disposition. This multicenter retrospective study included patients who visited the ED with pneumonia at a tertiary academic hospital in South Korea, as well as recorded in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV, v3.1) database during study periods. To compare AI-driven models with a traditional clinical scoring system, three survival prediction models were developed using a baseline CURB-65 score. Five variable sets were constructed by combining the CURB-65 score, AI-interpreted CXR findings, and additional clinical information. A total of 2,874 ED visits were analyzed. The random survival forest (RSF) model using the all-feature set (CURB-65, CXR interpretation, and clinical information) achieved a concordance index (C-index) of 0.872 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.861–0.886) in the test set, significantly outperforming the RSF model excluding the CXR interpretation information, which had a C-index of 0.865 (95% CI: 0.854–0.879). This study highlights the potential utility of a multimodal AI-driven prediction model to support prognosis estimation and clinical decision-making for patients with pneumonia in ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.