Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41772099›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Lightweight convolutional neural network for real-time earthquake P-wave detection on edge devices in New Zealand.

Danuka Ravishan, Raj Prasanna, Pasan Herath, Emma E H Doyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danuka RavishanJoint Centre for Disaster Research, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand. 22008603@massey.ac.nz.
Raj PrasannaJoint Centre for Disaster Research, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.
Pasan HerathEarth Sciences New Zealand, Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
Emma E H DoyleJoint Centre for Disaster Research, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Earthquake P-wave detection is the first and most critical step in Earthquake Early Warning (EEW), as detection speed determines how much time is available before strong shaking arrives, while detection accuracy governs the reliability of the warning. Conventional P-Wave detection methods such as Short-Term Average over Long-Term Average (STA/LTA) often struggle in complex noise environments and exhibit higher detection latency. Deep learning offers a more robust alternative by learning complex waveform characteristics directly from data, enabling faster and more reliable detections. However, the high computational cost of deep models limits their use on low-cost, resource-constrained edge devices in decentralized EEW networks. Here we present a lightweight Convolutional Neural Network optimized for real-time P- and S-wave detection on edge hardware using only two seconds of seismic input waveforms. Trained on approximately 89 K waveform segments recorded by strong-motion sensors across New Zealand, the model achieves an overall accuracy of 97.12% and correctly identifies 98% of P-wave segments. With ~ 38 K trainable parameters and sub-7-millisecond inference time on Raspberry Pi 5 hardware, the model demonstrates efficient operation under edge-computing constraints. Its ability to generalize to high-magnitude events highlights its strong potential for integration into distributed EEW systems.

Identifiers

PMID41772099
PMCPMC13057024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.