ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of the removal ability of Iodoform Paste in primary teeth pulpectomies using rotary files: a pilot study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim was to analyse the efficacy of Endogal Kids® rotary files in removing root canal filling. Methods: A cross-sectional in vitro study was conducted (n = 10 primary teeth). The root canals were instrumented using the Endogal Kids® system with 5 mL of 5% sodium hypochlorite solution and were obturated with CaOH2 and iodoform paste, Forendo™ Paste. The canal systems were retreated to remove the filling material using continuous rotation. µCT scans were performed at three time points: after canal instrumentation with rotary files (µCT-1), after root canal filling (µCT-2), and after removal of the filling material through retreatment (µCT-3). Canal void volume (CV), obturation material volume (MV), root canal void increase (ΔCV), obturation material increase (ΔMV) and filling removal volume (RV) were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed with a 95% significance level (p ≤ 0.05). Results: Significant differences were found for CV and MV, but not for TV. The canal void volume (CV) was significantly greater at µCT-1 compared to the µCT-2 and µCT-3, with no significant difference between the µCT-2 and µCT-3 (p < 0.001). Additionally, MV was significantly higher before removal of the filling material (p = 0.003). No significant differences were observed in TV across the three measurements. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrated that rotary instrumentation in primary teeth can remove a significant proportion of iodoform-based obturation material. Incisors showing greater obturation material removal, while molars exhibited more pronounced changes in canal volume.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.