Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41772086›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A unified EfficientSwinB-based framework for medicinal plant recognition and safflower germplasm classification.

Phuong Thuy Khuat, Hoang Thien Van

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Phuong Thuy KhuatFaculty of Information Technology, HUTECH University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Hoang Thien VanFaculty of Information Technology, HUTECH University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. vt.hoang@hutech.edu.vn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate recognition of medicinal plants and fine-grained crop genetic resources is essential for pharmacology, precision agriculture, and biodiversity conservation. However, leaf-based plant recognition remains challenging due to complex backgrounds, illumination variations, and subtle inter-class differences. To address these challenges, this study investigates plant image recognition at two levels of granularity. For general medicinal plant recognition under unconstrained outdoor conditions, we propose EfficientSwinB-SE, an enhanced Swin Transformer-based model that incorporates structured pruning and a squeeze-and-excitation module to improve efficiency and discriminative capability. For fine-grained classification of safflower germplasm varieties under controlled laboratory conditions, we further develop OLSF-EfficientSwinB-SE, a task-specific extension optimized for distinguishing closely related varieties. Experimental results demonstrate that EfficientSwinB-SE consistently outperforms SwinB and other state-of-the-art models, such as VGG11_bn, MobileNetV2, DenseNet, EfficientNetB4, ViT, ConvNeXt, and DeiT, in medicinal plant recognition, achieving accuracies of 99.75% on the Indian Medicinal Plant dataset and 97.70% on the Indonesian Medicinal Plant dataset. Meanwhile, OLSF-EfficientSwinB-SE achieves superior performance in fine-grained safflower germplasm classification with an accuracy of 91.63%. These findings confirm the effectiveness of the proposed framework for multi-level plant recognition, with practical applications in medicinal plant identification, germplasm management, and intelligent agricultural systems.

Indexed as

Carthamus tinctoriusImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPlants, MedicinalConvolutional Neural NetworksPlant LeavesDeep learningMedicinal plantPruningSqueeze and excitationSwin transformerVision transformer

Identifiers

PMID41772086
PMCPMC13066509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.