ArticleScientific reports2026
Propofol and dexmedetomidine sedation share the similar functional activity but distinct functional synchronization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is insufficient unified research on the effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine on brain functional activity and synchronization. We collected resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from 21 healthy subjects in four different levels of consciousness induced by propofol (awake, mild sedation, deep sedation, and recovery), and other 21 healthy subjects in three different levels of consciousness induced by dexmedetomidine (awake, mild sedation and recovery). The results showed that with the increasing of sedation levels of propofol or dexmedetomidine, fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations and regional homogeneity values decreased in the frontal lobe, while they increased in the superior temporal gyrus and paracentral lobule. Under propofol sedation, functional connectivity (FC) decreased both within and between sensorimotor network and attention network, and within and between the frontoparietal network (FPN) and default mode network (DMN). Simultaneously, a small number of increased connections were observed between the FPN, DMN, and other networks. Under dexmedetomidine sedation, generally decreased FC was observed in the whole brain. This study shows consistent effects on brain functional activity, but distinct impacts on functional synchronization, providing new insights into the understanding of anesthetic mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.