ArticleScientific reports2026
Exploring the anti-inflammatory effects of genistein in an in vitro lipopolysaccharide-induced macrophage model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genistein in polycystic ovary syndrome: mechanisms, preclinical evidence, and translational potential.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Review
- Plant polyphenols as context-dependent modulators of cellular signalling networks.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inflammation plays a central role in the onset and progression of numerous diseases, and macrophages are key regulators of this process through their polarization toward pro- or anti-inflammatory phenotypes. Natural bioactive compounds have emerged as promising candidates to modulate inflammatory responses. Amongst these, genistein, a soybean-derived isoflavone, was selected due to its reported anti-inflammatory and antioxidant profile across different cell types. In this study, we evaluated the effects of genistein in a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced macrophage model to investigate its cellular and molecular mechanisms of action. Genistein treatment at subcytotoxic concentration preserved cell viability, did not induce apoptosis or cell cycle arrest, and reduced oxidative stress. In LPS-stimulated macrophages, treatment with 5 µg/mL genistein significantly decreased nitric oxide production and downregulated pro-inflammatory markers while upregulating an anti-inflammatory mediator, thus reverting macrophage polarization to an anti-inflammatory phenotype. Protein analyses confirmed reduced expression of iNOS and cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α. Furthermore, genistein restored cell morphology and inhibited NF-κB p65 nuclear translocation, indicating its capacity to counteract LPS-driven pro-inflammatory signalling. These findings support the role of genistein in modulating macrophage polarization and inflammatory responses, highlighting its therapeutic potential for the management of acute and chronic inflammation-related disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.