ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Economic evaluation of a digital symptom checker for endometriosis using a Markov decision process model.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Shortening the Endometriosis Diagnostic Pathway: A Narrative Review and Research Agenda.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital symptom checkers (SCs) are increasingly used to support early symptom recognition and care-seeking, yet evidence on their cost-effectiveness remains limited. We conducted an economic evaluation of a digital SC for endometriosis, a prevalent but underdiagnosed condition, as a case study. We developed a Markov decision process model to compare the digital SC with the standard of care from a societal perspective. Over a 40-year horizon, the digital SC reduced diagnostic delay by 4.36 years, generated 0.049 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per person, saved $5196.22 in costs, and produced an incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) of $10,089.00 at a $100,000/QALY threshold. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these findings, with an INMB of $12,398.92 (95% CI: $11,893.11-$12,904.72). Scenario analyses showed that the SC remained cost-effective under a wide range of assumptions, with the greatest value realized when sensitivity and specificity were ≥0.7, compliance exceeded 45%, and a time horizon of at least 10 years. This study provides the first economic evaluation of a digital SC for endometriosis and illustrates when and how digital SCs can deliver value to patients and health systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.